Back to Guides
Buying·20 min read

Co-op vs Condo: Which Is Right for You?

A comprehensive comparison to help you choose the ownership structure that fits your lifestyle and goals.

The Fundamental Difference

Co-ops and condos may look identical from the outside, but they represent fundamentally different ownership structures. Understanding this distinction is essential before you start searching for your New York City home.

Condominium: You own your individual unit as real property, with a deed recorded in your name. You also own a percentage of the building's common areas (lobby, roof, hallways). It's true real estate ownership, similar to buying a house.

Cooperative: You don't own real estate. Instead, you buy shares in a corporation that owns the entire building. Those shares come with a proprietary lease granting you the right to occupy a specific apartment. You're a shareholder, not a property owner.

This distinction affects everything from financing and taxes to resale flexibility and day-to-day living.

The NYC Market Reality

In Manhattan, approximately 75% of residential apartments are co-ops. Condos, while growing in number due to new construction, remain the minority. This means:

  • Many desirable neighborhoods and buildings are exclusively co-op
  • Co-ops often occupy the best pre-war buildings with premium locations
  • Limiting yourself to condos significantly reduces your options
  • Understanding co-ops opens more of the market to you

Side-by-Side Comparison

FactorCo-opCondo
OwnershipShares in corporation + proprietary leaseDeed to real property
Board approvalRequired; can reject buyersRight of first refusal only
Down paymentTypically 20-50%Often 10-20%
Monthly feesMaintenance (includes property taxes)Common charges + separate property taxes
SublettingUsually restrictedTypically more flexible
Price per sq ft10-15% lower than equivalent condoPremium pricing
Building ageOften pre-war (pre-1940)Often newer construction
Foreign buyersOften restricted or prohibitedGenerally welcome

Board Approval: The Biggest Difference

The board approval process is what most distinguishes co-ops from condos, and it's often misunderstood.

Co-op Board Approval

Co-op boards have broad authority to approve or reject potential buyers. The process includes:

  • Comprehensive application package (financial documents, references, employment verification)
  • Board review of your financials against building standards
  • In-person interview with board members
  • Decision typically within 4-8 weeks of complete application

Boards can reject buyers without explanation, though they cannot discriminate based on protected characteristics. Common rejection reasons include insufficient finances, concerns about creditworthiness, or simply not being a "good fit."

Condo Board Rights

Condo boards have much less power. They typically have a "right of first refusal"—the ability to purchase the unit themselves at the agreed price. In practice, condo boards almost never exercise this right. There's no interview, no approval process, and no ability to reject qualified buyers.

Is Board Approval a Negative?

Many buyers initially view board approval as a hurdle. But consider the flip side:

  • Boards screen out financially unstable buyers who might default on maintenance
  • Buildings maintain standards for residents' behavior and building use
  • You're not just buying an apartment—you're joining a community
  • Well-managed co-ops often have stronger finances and better-maintained buildings

The same process that feels restrictive when you're buying protects your investment once you're an owner.

Financial Considerations

Purchase Price

Co-ops typically trade at a 10-15% discount compared to equivalent condos in the same neighborhood. A unit that would sell for $1.5 million as a condo might sell for $1.3 million as a co-op. This discount reflects:

  • Board approval uncertainty (smaller buyer pool)
  • Subletting restrictions (reduced investment appeal)
  • Higher down payment requirements
  • Less liquidity compared to condo ownership

Down Payment Requirements

Co-ops typically require larger down payments:

  • Most co-ops: 20-25% minimum, many require more
  • Prestigious buildings: 30-50% or all-cash required
  • Post-closing liquidity: Often 1-2 years of maintenance in liquid assets

Condos are more flexible:

  • Standard: 10-20% down payment
  • New construction: Sometimes 10% with developer incentives
  • No liquidity requirements: Beyond what lenders require

Monthly Costs

Co-op maintenance and condo common charges aren't directly comparable because they include different items:

Co-op Maintenance Includes:

  • Building operations (staff, utilities, repairs)
  • Your share of property taxes
  • Your share of building's mortgage interest
  • Reserve fund contributions
  • Insurance

Condo Common Charges Include:

  • Building operations (staff, utilities, repairs)
  • Reserve fund contributions
  • Insurance (building only, not your unit)

Note: Property taxes are billed separately to condo owners, often adding $1,000-2,000+ per month depending on unit value.

When comparing costs, add condo common charges plus property taxes to get an apples-to-apples comparison with co-op maintenance.

Flexibility and Restrictions

Subletting

Co-ops: Most restrict subletting significantly—often limiting it to 1-2 years out of every 5, requiring board approval, and charging sublet fees. Some buildings prohibit subletting entirely. This makes co-ops less suitable for investment purposes.

Condos: Generally allow subletting with minimal restrictions. Condo boards may require notification and tenant screening, but can't prohibit rentals. This makes condos more attractive for investors and those who might need flexibility.

Renovations

Both co-ops and condos require approval for renovations affecting building systems or structure. However:

  • Co-ops: Often have detailed alteration agreements and strict approval processes
  • Condos: Generally more streamlined, though still require approval for major work

Pied-à-Terre Use

Co-ops: Many prohibit or restrict pied-à-terre (part-time residence) use. Buildings want full-time residents who invest in the community.

Condos: Generally accept pied-à-terre use without restriction, making them more suitable for second homes or part-time NYC residents.

Who Should Choose a Co-op?

Co-ops may be right for you if:

  • You want to live in classic pre-war buildings with established character
  • You value community and stable neighbors
  • You can meet strict financial requirements and have strong documentation
  • You plan to live in the apartment full-time as your primary residence
  • You don't need to sublet or use the apartment as an investment
  • You appreciate the lower price per square foot
  • You're comfortable with the board approval process

Who Should Choose a Condo?

Condos may be right for you if:

  • You prefer newer construction with modern amenities
  • You need flexibility to sublet or rent your unit
  • You're buying as an investment property
  • You have a smaller down payment available
  • You're an international buyer or purchasing through an entity
  • You want a pied-à-terre for part-time use
  • You prefer a simpler purchase process without board interviews
  • You're self-employed with complex income documentation

Common Misconceptions

Myth: Co-ops Are Always Older Buildings

While most pre-war buildings are co-ops, some post-war and even newer buildings are organized as cooperatives. The choice of structure at conversion or construction depends on many factors.

Myth: Condos Have No Rules

Condos have bylaws, house rules, and boards that govern common areas and building operations. While less restrictive than co-ops, they're not a free-for-all.

Myth: Co-op Boards Are Arbitrary

Most co-op boards focus primarily on financial qualifications. Well-prepared buyers with strong finances are rarely rejected. The process is more systematic than many assume.

Myth: Condos Are Better Investments

While condos offer more flexibility, co-ops in good buildings have appreciated strongly over time. The lower purchase price can offset reduced liquidity for long-term owners.

Making Your Decision

Rather than declaring one type "better," focus on which fits your situation:

  • Timeline: How long do you plan to own? Co-ops reward long-term ownership
  • Finances: Can you meet co-op requirements, or do you need condo flexibility?
  • Use: Primary residence only, or need investment/subletting options?
  • Building preference: Pre-war character or modern amenities?
  • Location: Some neighborhoods are predominantly one type

The Bottom Line

Both co-ops and condos offer paths to New York City homeownership, each with distinct advantages and trade-offs. Co-ops offer value, community, and access to classic buildings but require financial strength and comfort with board governance. Condos offer flexibility, simpler transactions, and investment potential but come at premium prices.

The "right" choice depends entirely on your circumstances, goals, and priorities. Many buyers start open to both and let specific apartments guide their decision—falling in love with a particular unit often matters more than the ownership structure.

Francine Crocker helps clients navigate both co-ops and condos, matching ownership structures to individual needs. Whether you're committed to one type or open to both, her expertise ensures you find the right home in the right building for your situation.

Not sure which is right for you? Contact Francine for personalized guidance.

Related Articles

Ready to Start Your Search?

Let Francine help you find the perfect home—whether co-op or condo.

Schedule a Consultation